I hesitate to post about this kind of thing. It seems too much like sensationalism, a call to action with tongue in cheek. But what do you think? Is it entirely out of proportion to be thinking about renaming Glacier National Park due to the imminent diseappearance of its glaciers?
Never having visited it, I'm completely at a loss for an appropriate new name.
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
“Glacier Memorial National Park” of course! :-)
I like that! Or in the same theme: "Lost Glaciers National Park"?
Post a Comment